No. 21-8079
Kenyad Laquan Kelly v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court due-process federal-sentencing gall-v-united-states judicial-discretion legal-standard sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court Erred in Applying a Different Starting Point for Defendant's Sentence than the United States Sentencing Guidelines?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED L. Whether the District Court Erred in Applying a Different Starting Point for Defendant’s Sentence than the United States Sentencing Guidelines? i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Kenyad Kelly
Seth Allen Neyhart — Law Office of Seth A. Neyhart, Petitioner
Seth Allen Neyhart — Law Office of Seth A. Neyhart, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent