No. 21-8081

Moses Clark v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-06-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment habeas-corpus plea-agreement preliminary-hearing prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-12-02 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state court violated the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights by bringing the defendant before the magistrate within 48 hours after arrest

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . \, Review should be granted, beause the state Court fated +e bring Ane defendant befoce the magistrate Wien AG-hours after agtest, Violating The Fourth Amendment Right's To The United States Covetitub ont. 7 2. Keview should be avanted, because State court erred loy a second Prosecution: far the same oMense after w conviction, Violating Ue Double Seo pavay Cause of The Fifi Amendment Rights of The United States Const en. 3, Rey sew sleuld be granted, becawse Wedge Lichewel S. Kemalyan of Me Superior Court of Los Angeles Coumtby, dered He Peltioners motion evreneos\y pursuant to Code of Cit) Procedure section V10.\ and 10.35 viola ne feritione's Due Process of the United Sterbe Fourtecth Amendment of The Contdubion. , A, Review should be granted, because the State court dented the Peltionet’s Caltts +o View Wire. leady worn vide before We Rreltwinary Wearing» vidlatiwg The United States Foucth Amendments Const dional Right's. | 5. Zaiew should be granted, because Wee Shute court ested by delayed Defendant's Vightt's +a Weliminary Nearing, Wain tea days after lis exssos roger, ve olakino, Velioner’s Fights to The Vetted Shbes Fourl Amedment of Me Conch wh al, | G. Review should be grat ah, loecauce State Court loreach Hreir Conbroct the PebRione's Plex agreement by sentencing the Petihower tothe Walter and Miran reQised to Recall of Sentence pursuant to Pena) Code Section W10, Subdiuisiten CA)sy$ Penal Cocke Section WU, subdivision (a)-Ce), and Georae Cascaf: Specia) Direchve 2O-OF. . 1 Ceview shold beqranted, be cavse Slee. Cooctade dtivlg Wiearsayy evidence fo determine the rut, Violating RebHone’s ConCronteti on Clauce OF The United State Sixt Amendment of Yue Conshdotlon %, Review should be guunted, becawce Skate Court Prosecutor Chelsa 4. Blodt Vindictively prosecuted We defencleut, Violatt ng his Dove Slocess Clause of The Unded States Conatri ow of Me Fourteenth, Avmendmn ett, shou heater above the pebtvon for a weit of eeobiccan Resped fully <obmAted, Wt ve Moses Clack . ) Death! May 22,2022

Docket Entries

2022-12-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-10-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2022)

Attorneys

Moses Clark
Moses Clark — Petitioner
Moses Clark — Petitioner