No. 21-8086
Jeremiah F. Wooden v. Massachusetts
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-record guilty-plea ineffective-assistance informed-consent meritorious-defenses plea-bargaining plea-counsel right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether plea counsel has a duty to advise of the impact of a conviction on his client's criminal record before a guilty plea
Question Presented (from Petition)
Questions Presented 1. Whether, under the Sixth Amendment, plea counsel has a duty to advise of the impact of a conviction on his client’s criminal record before his client tenders a guilty plea, especially where the circumstances minimize its true consequences, to ensure an informed decision about whether to forever forfeit his meritorious defenses.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-07
Waiver of right of respondent Massachusetts to respond filed.
2022-06-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2022)
Attorneys
Jeremiah Wooden
Michael Anthony Waryasz — Law Offices of Michael A. waryasz, Petitioner
Michael Anthony Waryasz — Law Offices of Michael A. waryasz, Petitioner
Massachusetts
Anna E. Lumelsky II — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Anna E. Lumelsky II — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent