No. 21-809

Alexander Gallo v. District of Columbia

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-12-01
Status: Rehearing
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights contract-clause due-process eviction-moratorium property-rights standing strict-scrutiny takings takings-clause
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Takings
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Legislature's Closing of Landlord-Tenant Court Violates Access to the Court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In 2020, several states and municipalities imposed uncompensated “eviction ban” moratoria. This petition concerns the District of Columbia’s municipal banheld unconstitutional by the District's Superior Court. The questions presented , are: : 1. Whether a Legislature’s Closing of . Landlord-Tenant Court Violates Access to the Court 2. Whether Fundamental Rights of Property : } ; are Fundamental Rights Warranting ; Strict Scrutiny 3. Whether the Withdrawal of Possessory _ Remedy Against a Lessee in Breach of : Contract Violates the Contract Clause : 4. Whether Knick v. Township of Scott, 588 U.S. ___ (2019) Abolished Declaratory or Injunctive Relief for a Continuous Taking : 5. Whether Suspension of a Homeowner’s ; Right to Possess or Exclude is a Taking of Property a f ; s , ’ . . . :

Docket Entries

2022-06-06
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-05-17
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-04
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)

Attorneys

Alexander Gallo
Alexander Gallo — Petitioner
Alexander Gallo — Petitioner
District of Columbia
Loren L. AliKhanD.C. Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Loren L. AliKhanD.C. Office of the Attorney General, Respondent