No. 21-8093
Albert Aiad-Toss v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553 18-USC-3553a abuse-of-discretion criminal-procedure district-court-discretion procedural-reasonableness reasonableness sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Aiad-Toss's lifetime supervised release term was procedurally unreasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether Mr. Aiad-Toss's lifetime supervised release term was procedurally unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately explain its decision and substantively unreasonable because the district court ignored 18 U.S.C. Section 3553(a)'s mandate to impose a term no greater than necessary.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent