Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the contingent beneficiary where there is a genuine dispute of material fact regarding the primary beneficiary's involvement in the insured's murder

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED KS.A. 59-515 Kansas Staturoay anid Common (Awd emus qaine Fads of UNRGINEd questions oF ENoRmousiy (ONSEqHENTIAl Fact as presented 4ugough otter Quars, Pateick Frantz ASK THE Guts to twist (CPA. 59-513 is & manner te (ERiSlatuec Never intended by issuing Life iNsuRAnle benefits fo A (ontingur Heneficinay Accused of THE Murder oF He insured. Berbpra's CRiminal Appeal CENTERS o8 THE ClAim fat tHe Police investigation © WRongfuuley Concerterrted on HER Ande IGNORE THE Weight oF tHE Evidence , Pointing towards TrtRick’s quit. FRIKiKs Jummeny Sudgmasr Ces CASES . Gimphy wiapplicable f Me facts ar Hand WHERE tHe Ontugasr beneRcary (Fekrick), Has (oeen accused oF Me Murder FoR witch THE PRimany beneficiary (Barbara) wes (onvided. Summary Sudamesre is only AppRopRIAte if PatRick Aemanstantes tHe THERE is” ND genuine dispute’ About Ary mateaial Tract: A 1SS¥e af Fret i Mateeial” if under tHE Substpnitve [Aul 15 EseNtial to . "ANE PROPER dispostion oF THE ClAIH oR defense. A dispute of Fret i9 OENUING “Ee 4he Evidence 19 Suck tHat A KEPGonable Jury (puld Return a Verdict Fir ( Summary Sudqmenst) NONMOving grey frteeck HAs Not and Gud Ret Cite A CASE {HA SuPpRIS AUAAdiNg DEnefiis under tHese GRcumstrNcs. RESEARCH by Barbaars Counse( did: Not Reveal ANY Suctt CASES. TN A SrfuetiON Suct #5 “AHS , WHERE 416 PRIMARY ANd COMMINGeHT penchiarey EAct ARGUE THe OTHER wars Reaporsivle FOR tHe dear oF He INouREd, tr MAKES Jense to writ to disperse tHE Fursds UNE THE CRimnwal pRocecdings are fully Resolved, witch Has been BarhAeds Request from tte starch SA Cee wit wink es Sort oF FAcMA dispute 15 INAPPROARIME FoR Surmacy Pudgnerss: See FEd.R, C.P. SE ca). THE body (Ameen FOOHREE SHowTng Cen IAEREEECAKEON OF FAHICiCK. fo THE Sthooter ANA THE Evidence thet Frteick Lied Ploouet this Pipi , Required fs CReAte oe Gouc vF matenial Fack IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ; Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW oe Px For cases from federal courts: . pe . The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at