No. 21-8097
Thomas Randall Ainsworth v. Robert Powell, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-sentencing drug-laws due-process equal-protection sentencing statutory-interpretation utah
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the differing penalties established by Utah's drug and measurable substance provisions violate due process or equal protection
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : 2c WeetHee THE TENTH CIRCUITS. | CERIFICATE 0£ APPERLABIIIY (COA) _| ANALYSIS ConFLIClS WITH THE FIFTH , CUIRCUIT SS COA ANALY SJS0 WE, WHETHER THE DIFFERING EMALTIES _| ESTABLISHED BY UTAH'S DUG AND | MBASURABLE= SUBSTANCE FROVISIONS _ | WiOLATE Due PROCESS OR FQUAL es LOTECTION. | Wr. WHETHER AINShloRtl SHouLD Be _| GéANTEP A A,
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Powell, Warden to respond filed.
2022-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Robert Powell, Warden
Mark C. Field — Utah Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Mark C. Field — Utah Attorney General's Office, Respondent