No. 21-8106

Jay Jurdi v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure government-misconduct ineffective-assistance jurisdictional-issue legal-standard preservation-of-error procedural-question self-incrimination sentencing statutory-provisions writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Brent's counsel ineffective for failing to object to, and thereby preserve for review, the government-intended use of a novel, self-incriminating process of refusal to answer his sentence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED lL. Was Brent's counsel ma RReeive Lor Poaiung te old\ect ta, and aheralay Pre Sex wR Poe NEPEAN, Tro Oe eX ad Qovarninant— twhended bs use a nov quelvRowag eroc ofReuse to PWawrer Wis SIWtenccr? 2. Was Doerz's counsel ao Red iusn Soc Ws Pa\unr Loe resguask Vek thie Xi sivied TOMY Faso the Locors COMA Avrd Noe Comma’ & Vanlure clo (290285 @ MorR spaces Qye and Auras Amma TFS AMR Ae trek FE RwoolN PeQracnProw AalWaavcrivens ~ Losalucrely orwstal V& Vac} WAstvucked -ko Vain boy ae Couch ® | 3, Was “YAR g Coun sai aRQe Ano Coe WSs Pol Wire, Ss clave} So zo Prosgcudoy’y kKwue Wing US® o& olan RVicdance ly Y Airrrowy Gra SLOP

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 11, 2022)

Attorneys

Jay Jurdi
Jay Jurdi — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent