Whether the lower court erred and abused its discretion in not finding petitioner was deprived of his 5th and 14th amendment rights

ISSUES PRESENTED 1. Whether Or Not The Lower Court: Erred And Abused Its Discretion In NOT. Finding Petitioner Was Deprived Of His 5th And 14th Amendment Rights When The Trial Court Misguoted .and. Misapplied The "5th AMENDMENT RIGHT AGAINST To Petitioner's Detriment, And In Conflict With This Court's And Other Court Of Appeals Precedent. : 2. Whether Or Not The Lower Court Erred And Abused Its Discretion In NOT Finding The "VOIR DIRE" Proceedings Were. So Tainted As To Deprive Petitioner Of His Right To A Fair And Impartial Adjudicator, And By Extension, His Right To A Fair And Impartial Trial, When Its Ruling Was A Far Departure From This Court's Accepted And Usual Course Of Action. Governing VOIR DIRE Proceedings. . 3... Whether Or Not The Lower Court's Ruling On Petitioner's : _ Claim “Of “INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL" Conflicts With This Court's. And Other Court Of Appeals Precedent, And Has .So Far Departed From The Accepted And Usual Course Of Judicial Proceedings Governing I.A.C. Claims, As To Warrant This Court's Exercist Of Its Supervisory Power To Correct The Error. : : _ 4. Whether OrNot The Lower Court Erred And Abused Its Discretion in NOT Finding A Breach Of Petitioner's : "BRADY RIGHTS", When The Non-Disclosed And Non-Produced Evidence Was "MATERIAL" And Deprived Petitioner Of His Right To A Fair And Impartial Trial, In Conflict With: Precedent From This Court And Other Courts Of Appeal. ii .