No. 21-8131

Daniel A. Rodriguez v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process newly-discovered-evidence plea-bargaining post-conviction-relief statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a Silonk Plea Foraclose a ddfondant From flint a Mlohion For Newly Discovered Evitelone@.

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Does a Silonk Plea Foraclose a ddfondant From flint a Mlohion For Newly Discovered _ Evitelone@., Pursuant to Rerle 33, : Where i . . a\ the statute is ambiJous, As it doas not directly Prohibit a defendant that his trial was in form ef a Pica’ bY WS Plaa was sans waivers: . ec) the Nowly discovered evidence . admitedty was discovered PaStSentencin I$ Plea : hex Co dd) the Newly discovered eidanca. holds p02, Wat Conshi tutional ramitlications undar Due Pnc.0ss: oc) He MowlY discovered evidence would have altered We outcome of the case’ €\ Bnd where, No. ober Remedy onist., 4) Also whora neithor the Government or the District Court Obdect $a Rule 43 aS wrond vehicla. STATUTORY PROVISION’ LNVOLVED , — Neehian 465 of Title 28 of US Code

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 14, 2022)
2022-05-04
Application (21A683) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 3, 2022.
2022-04-27
Application (21A683) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 4, 2022 to June 3, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Daniel A. Rodriguez
Daniel A. Rodriguez — Petitioner
Daniel A. Rodriguez — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent