Whether errors in jury selection resulted in seating a biased juror, or deprivation of the mandated number of peremptory challenges should have been reviewed under the due process standard that applied when appeal should have been brought and decided, said standard beginning at the remedy of reversal

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED — TL Whether errors in jury selection resulted in seating o biased juror, of deprivation of the mandated number oF peremptory challenges should have been Ceview ed undep the due process ; standard that applied when appeal should have heen braught and decided , said standard heguin ag the remedy ot revetsal, o The US. Dietrich Court Por the Eastern Ditnctet Wisconsta. answered: No, and declined + issue alos. | ¢ The United States ( ourt ot App tals fo the Seventh Circuit agreed. . ThWhether petitioner received inePPective assistance of counse } in ViolocHon of str) ckland v. Washington, HEGUS, CCB (924) when counsel Pailed to request a Necessary juty iastruction to clarify the crime chatged, of when counsel Parle te interview of call a witness who weuld have testified to Pacts that were othenwite missing and would have provided cfucial evidence Supporting debense theory, © The LS. District Pourttyn the Eastern District of Wisconsin onsvered : No, and declined to issue a COA, *The United Ay lates Conrtoh Appeals Poe the Seventh Mreui} agree it