No. 21-8139
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: availability confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process government-agent minors testimonial-hearsay witness-availability
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Confrontation Clause violated?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Was the Confrontation Clause violated when the State presented testimonial hearsay consisting of out-of-court statements to a government agent allegedly made by two minors when one of them did not testify at trial and the other proved incapable of testifying at trial? 1 SGR/36248437.1
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-15
Waiver of right of respondent State of Georgia to respond filed.
2022-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Duenta Grier
Edward H. Wasmuth Jr. — Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP, Petitioner
State of Georgia
Stephen John Petrany — Georgia Department of Law, Respondent