No. 21-8140

Richard Chippero v. Matthew J. Platkin, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review burden-of-proof constitutional-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process insufficient-evidence legal-sufficiency sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should Petitioner's convictions be vacated due to insufficient evidence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Should Petitioner’s convictions be vacated because the evidence was wholly insufficient to sustain his convictions? i

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent Attorney General of New Jersey to respond filed.
2022-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Attorney General of New Jersey
Nancy A. HulettDivision of Criminal Justice, Respondent
Nancy A. HulettDivision of Criminal Justice, Respondent
Richard Chippero
Craig S. Leeds — Petitioner
Craig S. Leeds — Petitioner