Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio erred in denying the Petitioners' request for mediation proceedings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) It appears there is an obvious and critical miscarriage of justice against the Petitioner, Gregory T. Ackerman and Joyce L. Ackerman (Spouse) on two important public constitutional case matters that are before The Supreme Court of Ohio. 2) Petitioner, (Sole Appellant) Joyce L. Ackerman is seeking mediation pursuant to R.C. 2323.06. Mortgagor and mortgagee mediation., S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.02. Request for Mediation, S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.01. and Mediation Proceedings, and S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.02. Privileges and Confidentiality, from The Supreme Court of Ohio with an ‘Emergency request and motion for compelling mediation’ to refer to its mediator for important mediation proceedings, to decrease possible further litigation and additional expenses. 3) Petitioner, Appellant provides substantive and substantial grounds for mediation specified in the “Emergency Memorandum in Support of Compelling Mediation Proceedings.”, filed with the Clerk of Court Office at the Supreme Court of Ohio, on January 21, 2022. 4) Petitioner(s) respectfully motions this honorable Court for “stay” of deadlines to file for a writ of certiorari, from “Reconsideration Entry”, filed by The Supreme Court of Ohio, on October 26, 2021, pending the possible outcome of Petitioner’s request for mediation and mediation proceedings.