No. 21-8150

Lorenzo Shelton v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment cell-phone cell-phone-privacy exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment parole parole-conditions reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure warrantless-search
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower courts erred in allowing the Petitioner's cell phone to be searched just because he was on State parole

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED #2 ‘ The U.S. Court of Appeals should have vacated and suppressed the fruits of the warrantless parole search of 317 Tillman Lane, because there was no reliability nor basis of knowledge for the anonymous tip that started this unconstitutional Fourth 2 Amendment search. Petitioner requested a suppression hearing in this case based on violations of his Fourth Amendment rights, unconstitutional circumstances, and a warrantless, suspicionless search of the Petitioner beceuse he was a parolee in which in this case was based on unconstitutional circumstances, indicating that the search was conducted out of personal animosity and inherently a suspect suspicionless search from a tips

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)

Attorneys

Lorenzo Shelton
Lorenzo Shelton — Petitioner
Lorenzo Shelton — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent