Lorenzo Shelton v. United States
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the lower courts erred in allowing the Petitioner's cell phone to be searched just because he was on State parole
QUESTION PRESENTED #2 ‘ The U.S. Court of Appeals should have vacated and suppressed the fruits of the warrantless parole search of 317 Tillman Lane, because there was no reliability nor basis of knowledge for the anonymous tip that started this unconstitutional Fourth 2 Amendment search. Petitioner requested a suppression hearing in this case based on violations of his Fourth Amendment rights, unconstitutional circumstances, and a warrantless, suspicionless search of the Petitioner beceuse he was a parolee in which in this case was based on unconstitutional circumstances, indicating that the search was conducted out of personal animosity and inherently a suspect suspicionless search from a tips