Did the Lower Court Err in dismissing Appellants Civil Action for a lack of Stating a Claim for which Relief May be Granted?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Lid tte Lower Court L£ir in ois musing Appellants Cif Action far aq lack oF Stating Q Clim for which Relief May he Ge antec Yes. | bid the Lower Court Em 17 djscrassiag The Appellant Lav Vu where: A ppellast Who Was a TJovenle Volanlfoby Llassihied @ Career Crimwhal anf tried tn Coniicfed and Sentence (1 the Career Critunel frogram as a Career (rininal €ren fhovoh he wees Cf Tovenife. and meet the theory if 1 ‘Llass of one 2° Yes. Did the Lower Court Err in desrnicsing Appellant Law Svit For Fake Lmpnsoni orton inleuhl Kestunt where the Respondlengs used RAW Gnd FRAODUL EIT OF CONCEALMENT 70 (ver ip the FRAD ? yes | |