Whether prison officials are deliberately indifferent when they delay or intentionally interfere with medical treatment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Lf x never Deviated Fron +e foot Nlath Clreut Case, law [Jackson V, Mecintosh Joesuss030 (FoI, 119C) Quotes fri son officials ate deliber attely pidifhereat When. --th dey, delay, or tatentonally interfere. wWeth medica) treeriment; (he plans |for Vs Cooked [991 6d 062, [Doe (TC, 1992) we Cf, When x the, Petitioner USed These Case laws the denied Mey Wher Phe R 3 edly Cancelled Surgery ond zrrterfvonally interfered With medical treatment by denying ) delay é Surgery For Wer (S)years Prolonging my Symptoms SE Reties Storoch Bin, blenly Steel Dlawinesc, Soil ef bret Blurry eye visters, and Iter na] bleeding giving Reltvonr Der (39) biood Transfus ions § )This is Tinminert Danger | wv Oa Pow Can Vou deny your own law) Y 8 Th ry argumert & Showed more Evicence f Carcelled Seigesy ee amendmen te Pleadings is forficularly important for rials Is Yor More Prone To makla Errors tn Pleadiag Than the fefSon whe beneits From the raphecartalion of Couns (Lopez v.Smi) 303 F340, p1BI(Puir 2000) (Quotira AvDll Ve. Cat l9ny) POF F ded IY ) N48 (Fear, 1987), | Tre Jenieney is ampliHed Iw Civil Refs Cases, [Eldridge V Beck) gan F.gd 132, 1/96 (ethos 1997) f —