No. 21-8160

Jamie M. Coffey v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process griffith-v-kentucky judicial-precedent retroactive-application retroactivity
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the State and Federal courts violate a petitioner's 14th Amendment Right to due process when they decline to apply a new rule governing a criminal procedure retroactively to a case pending on appeal contrary to this Court's holding in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 315, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Do the State and Federal courts violate a petitioner’s 14 Amendment Right to due process when they decline to apply a new rule governing a criminal procedure | retroactively to a case pending on appeal contrary to this Court’s holding in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 315, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)? i ”

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)
2022-05-16
Application (21A719) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 16, 2022.
2022-05-06
Application (21A719) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 17, 2022 to July 16, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Jamie M. Coffey
Jamie M. Coffey — Petitioner
Jamie M. Coffey — Petitioner