Whether the district court legally dismissed the appeal without a hearing, in violation of due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED And iJ] Vln ted 225-3 / egal/y dis misseJ the Apnea] withe @ Frou of a Tud a ove 1& JOiw9 yy YAGe, IN Violakig LAw, ~ OF Due Process of 2) Chi | ® | MEF Clerk Sandy Oppcic). ° bo Coven yy Forged a Svdge 4 Ors Le P her Fen u den: 3 VMAme “Cound oF € dewalt, jy 7y eo Nk ¢ Federgy 4 FASS CY L£Y2 Leverage, I4ks O POF Reg gy | Khel U s done a} 4 C Pons the G ‘ler fhe Colog | on ASe Neve henn t Av PERO doy ; SF La, Cound. On bs er rhe ; x ‘Ke Cour¢ O Sig ‘ take And Feder Th Cleeve | ad Pollon, And CAS SU e/ FRe04.@ Coong Cr ; Se 8 Sham. L Aeelete og <9 [ T Roe. @ Wh SB, And FRE ele OD0eoc::! “aR iny WASH hwo 2