No. 21-8169

Ghassan Hage v. Fida Mhanna

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-06-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights default-judgment due-process due-process-violation family-law fraud fraud-upon-court judicial-abuse-of-discretion judicial-misconduct legal-ethics
Key Terms:
Takings
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where Fraud upon the Court became normal in Family Justice Center in Santa Clara county, Department 76 when a lawyer committed numerous count of Fraud and a Judge of the Superior Court allowed them

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented | (1) Where Fraud upon the Court became normal in Family Justice Center in Santa Clara county, Department 76 when a lawyer committed numerous count of Fraud and a Judge of the Superior Court allowed them, (2) where corruption in Family Justice center in Santa Clara County is much more powerful than the Justice, (8) when the Judge of the Superior Court abused his power to cover up the Fraud upon the Court committed by a lawyer, (4) where Judge and lawyer in the Superior Court set a trial date on a day when both were notified that the petitioner was not available for a trial, (5) where Judge of the Superior Court abused his authority and discretion and issued a default judgment with falsified lawyer hourly fees when petitioner was not available with a Good cause (

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)

Attorneys

Ghassan Hage
Ghassan Hage — Petitioner