No. 21-8174
IFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege attorney-client-relationship confiscation criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-strategy
Key Terms:
DueProcess TradeSecret Privacy
DueProcess TradeSecret Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant is denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a criminal defendant is denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel when the prosecutor purposely interferes with the attorney-client relationship when it confiscates and reviews legal paperwork from the accused’s jail cell which contains attorney-client privileged communications and trial strategy. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-15
Brief of respondent Ohio in opposition filed.
2022-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Scott Svoboda
Bryan Roger Perkins — Bryan Roger Perkins, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
State of Ohio
David P. Fornshell — Warren County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent