Whether petitioners' Fourth Amendment rights were violated when they were arrested without a warrant and subjected to a warrantless search and seizure

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED } Zs Aneye 4 coupAhin 4 wm pov Fant” wnt . 3 ; Mayne Van, conden Ane canfey t hoy a) PAT oners fromy Grecene PIL9 * 4-9 $44) and the fan We CA Supevyov con T ; _ SEV; Cowy (conv W acini for, PE cd ® (6 0% 93) coms Hopkins ere ge an 461) 2) Bs Yneve 0 compel lag wag banth co Wotana\ qeron mam amendment Wey al seqrd 4 5AtWR envy Fa jnong without—a Seardy Wavrany ( ry “| yedse evvor) 3 )Ss there « roagalling wagon Fay vonstitetional qvetion wa oth AM Qu Meal iA Aon ofa lovased ) vow 3 UteIqe on aye (TAC and weal ywdaye wor) Ne) S) 4) Ty Myetc a Compelling Vagrant OM emendmentd constrtctrenc| Violation et tien 1) a Baton vid\ation Levoseevyavial mis on du dp ana wel yay enyon ) | 5) Sine a cougel\ vy \wgortay th omen diner constictan «| Vv AV 0 oti Fy We proscar, velauoimas > bwyden to tony \r enon a RAS AIO\K douloy . ee ee ee