Whether the Court of Appeals erred, contravening Supreme Court precedent set forth in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., by weighing Mr. Grogan's alternative forms of religious exercise rather than considering the magnitude of his punishment when answering the threshold question of whether Mr. Grogan's exercise of religion was 'substantially burden[ed]' under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court of Appeals erred, contravening Supreme Court precedent set forth in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., by weighing Mr. Grogan’s alternative forms of religious exercise rather than considering the magnitude of his punishment when answering the threshold question of whether Mr. Grogan’s exercise of religion was “substantially burden[ed]” under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.