Does a State Judge have authority to preside over a case when they have a conflict of interest?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.Does a State Judges have authority to preside over a case when He/She has a conflict of interest Does absolute immunity apply when a judge has acted criminally under color of law and without jurisdiction, as well as actions taken in an administrative capacity to influence cases? 2.Does Eleventh Amendment immunity apply when officers of the court have violated 31 U.S. Code § 3729 and the state has refused to provide any type of declaratory relief? 3.Does Title IV-D, Section 458 of the Social Security Act violate the United States Constitution due to the incentives it creates for the court to willfully violate civil rights of parties in child custody and support cases? §.Can a state force a bill of attainder on a natural person in force you into slavery 6.Can a judge have Immunity for their non judicial activities who knowingly violate civil rights Can child support take your stimulus check? Federal law Title 1V-D of the Social Security Act pub L. No 93-647, 88 Stat 2351(1975),42 USC 651 (8/22/1996), as amended. Created Keith cause of action 42 USC 658 (a) and (f) provides profit for practice of the above; By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42 is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutessuch as the Public Health Service Act and the Social Security Actthat have been editorially compiled and organized into the title, but the title itself has not been enacted 42 USC 1983 Deprivation of rights under color of law itself provides Keith relief (b) Non positive federal creates Keith cause of action, and federal law itself provides Therefore the federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction under federal question jurisdiction ; 8.Can a natural person be forced into a contract The statutory "substantial compliance" requirement, see, e.g., 42 U. S. C. A. §609(a)(8) (Nov. 1996 Supp.), does not give rise to individual rights; it was not intended to benefit individual children and custodial parents, but is simply a yardstick for the Secretary to measure the system wide performance of a State's Title IV-D program, BLESSING, DIRECTOR, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE v. FREESTONE et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit See. Alexander v. Bothsworth, 1915. "Party cannot be bound by contract that he has not made or authorized. Free consent is an indispensable element in making valid contracts." Page 2 See. Montgomery v state 55 Fla. 97-45S0.879 a. "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." ; .