No. 21-8194
Richard Reynolds, et al. v. Angel Quiros, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-agency administrative-law constitutional-review corrections due-process first-amendment free-speech prison-regulations sexually-explicit-materials turner-standard turner-v-safley
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state administrative agency can deny access to publications protected by the First Amendment based on incarceration status
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a state administrative agency, based upon the recommendation of an ad hoc committee, can deny access to publications protected by the First pictorial sexually explicit materials—simply because the plaintiffs are incarcerated within a facility operated by the Connecticut Department of Correction or whether the Department’s administrative rule violates the First Amendment based on the factors set out in Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987).
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent Angel Quiros to respond filed.
2022-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2022)
2022-04-12
Application (21A595) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 20, 2022.
2022-04-07
Application (21A595) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 4, 2022 to June 18, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Angel Quiros
Steven R. Strom — Assistant Attorney General, Respondent
Richard Reynolds, et al.
Matthew Joseph Letten — Day Pitney LLP, Petitioner