Whether appellate review of a sentence imposed after the revocation of a defendant's supervised-release term is for reasonableness or merely to see if the sentence is plainly unreasonable

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether appellate review of a sentence imposed after the revocation of a defendant’s supervised-release term is for reasonableness, as United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007) and Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 762 (2020) indicate or is, as the Fifth Circuit held, merely to see if the sentence is plainly unreasonable.