No. 21-8198
Ruben Cabrera Saucedo v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure davis-precedent district-court-discretion double-jeopardy motion-to-vacate sentence-modification sentencing unconstitutional unconstitutional-conviction united-states-v-davis
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, after a motion to vacate sentence is granted on a conviction that is unconstitutional under United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), a district court may increase the sentence on an unrelated count
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether, after a motion to vacate sentence is granted on a conviction that is unconstitutional under United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), a district court may increase the sentence on an unrelated count.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Ruben Cabrera Saucedo
Philip J. Lynch — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent