No. 21-8207

Jamal A. Azeez v. Cedrick Robertson, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-23
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence aedpa antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act brady-evidence civil-rights due-process factual-innocence judicial-conspiracy standing statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court condoned systemic injustice knowing that the petitioner is 'factually innocent'

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : To Earn Two Convié. ns (One Reversed By The Fede. Court) Responsible : For 13 years of Sought The Arrest, Indictment, And Convictions of The Defendants (Like Steve Banon and Roger Stone) 3. Whether The Lower Court Condoned Systemic Injustice Knowing That Petitioner Is “Factually Innocent” To Invoke The Principles Under This Cited Authority: Mcquiggin V. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013), In Which This Court Held That “Actual Innocence, If Proven, Is Sufficient _To Circumvent The One-Year Statute Of Limitations For Petitioners To Appeal Their Conviction Enacted Within The Antiterrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act Of 1996 (AEDPA)”.

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Jamal Azeez
Jamal A. Azeez — Petitioner