Whether the State of Texas can grant extended bail without first meeting the burden of proving the petitioner's identity?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED QGan the State 6f texas Grant extandidreel withoot fast meehay them burden! 4 comtiam fethower’s Teentity? . .,.. Ate Petitioner, by Wie swory testimony and Sunn abiidevit, Squaély placed his Identrty ints a live clipute whew the Hosds Gorekavks warkaat Conteied ALE weoreect heeitals, snchidlhyy aw wenenect Tdewhtyng hetuee, Social Secveity wumbee, previous scldeessessud aw mcourcet Kelght all peatsinmg to TUTCH Some ove othex tau ths Aetrhewer:[ 0.A.20205N 268-270] See Appertl S. 2). Did the US. distect Court $b. Téxas-; deviate team tis Hounewble * Counts holding in Michigan Vs boann, 139 US. 292,290, 99 S.Ct 590, 535 SBL. td 521 0970), 4 covet considering NIEMSE wn Habeas Loxpus can do NO mone than decide (0) whether the Exhendin bocuments an there face weee W oedee, (6) whether the pettavee uss seged with a ceime wW the demanding state, Ce) uhethee be peter 1s wamed in the Request toa Extendttow, and (d) whetles the pettanée ts 0 Agilne’)? [8.0.A. 20-2050. 209 276] See.