No. 21-8220

Mary Alice Nelson-Rogers v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-limitations damages federal-court-jurisdiction federal-jurisdiction internal-revenue-code moot-controversies mootness standing
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-11-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Involves both constitutional limitations on federal court jurisdiction and prudential limitations on its exercise concerning moot controversies. The question of standing in the Eastern District Court of California on the 5' Amended Complaint and whether the litigant is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of the particular issues. ; ; 2. Whether Petitioner may recover damages against the United States under Section 7433 of the Internal Revenue Code when they show that they sustained “actual, direct economic damages * * * as a proximate result of? (26° : : U.S.C. 7433(b)(1) the unlawful acts of a revenue officer.

Docket Entries

2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-14
Petitioner complied with order of October 3, 2022.
2022-10-03
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent IRS, et al. to respond filed.
2022-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2022)

Attorneys

IRS, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Mary Alice Nelson-Rogers
Mary Alice Nelson-Rogers — Petitioner