No. 21-8221
Isiah Paul Mendez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act breaking-and-entering criminal-law north-carolina north-carolina-criminal-law predicate-offense statutory-interpretation taylor-v-united-states united-states-supreme-court united-states-v-johnson
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the North Carolina crime of breaking and entering can be a predicate for the Armed Career Criminal Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER OR NOT THE NORTH CAROLINA CRIME OF BREAKING AND ENTERING (N.C. GEN STAT. §14-54), AS DEFINED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA SUPRME COURT, CAN BE UTILIZED AS A PREDICATE FOR . FINDING A DEFENDANT SUCH AS MR. MENDEZ. ACCOUNTABLE UNDER THE ARMED CAREER CRIMINAL ACT (18. U.S.C. §924(e)) AFTER CONSIDERING UNITED STATES V JOHNSON, 576 US 591(2015)., TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES, 495 US 13 (2005), AND THEIR PROGENY. | | | 2 | I.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Isiah Paul Mendez
Todd Allen Smith — Smith Giles PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent