No. 21-8237
Odece Dempsean Hill v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause crawford-precedent crawford-v-washington forensic-nurse-examiner melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts ninth-circuit sexual-assault sexual-assault-victim testimonial-statements
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Confrontation Clause permits the prosecution to introduce the testimonial statements of a non-testifying sexual-assault-victim lay-witness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Confrontation Clause permits the prosecution to introduce the testimonial statements of a non-testifying sexual assault victim lay witness, as to her experiences and observations, through the in-court testimony of a forensic nurse examiner. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. to respond filed.
2022-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2022)
Attorneys
Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.
Casey Douglas Ball — Office of the Arizona General, Respondent
Casey Douglas Ball — Office of the Arizona General, Respondent