Sammy L. Page v. Audrey King, Acting Executive Director, California Department of Mental Health
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Does a circuit court abuse its discretion and violate the party-presentation principle by adjudicating a habeas-corpus-petition under 28-usc-2254 when the petition was brought under 28-usc-2241 to challenge a pretrial-detention
QUESTIONS PRESENTED |. Does a circuit court abuse its discretion and violate the principle of party presentation by adjudicating a habeas corpus petition under § 28 U.S.C. 2254, when the petition was brought under § 28 U.S.C. 2241 to challenge a pretrial detention? ll. Does a circuit conflict exist as to whether a due process claim is proper to seek injunctive relief from an allegedly wrongful pretrial detention in State SVP proceedings, under Kansas v. Hendricks and Boumedienne v. Bush, even though Manuel v. City of Joliet, 137 S. Ct. 911, 919, 197 L. Ed. 2d 312 (2017), a civil rights case, required a claim concerning pretrial detention to be raised under the Fourth Amendment? Or must Manuel v. City of Joliet be limited to its own procedural posture, which entailed accrual questions applicable to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cases, and not extended to a petition for injunctive relief brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241?