Is the Ish Amendment right of access to the courts violated?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 7 Is the Ish Amandment right of access te the eoeurts win lated’ cohen magistrate; Ais Yriat) and atreurt jesiges, ; Personally ya tase) agamst TARAM SIE Vitcaauks , khave the Yiinds elt Sot the presenet \Weaoo ts lise nothing Seng: and unethi anr\ly Se ankroenweralely® KASS tele Aidiccal (Pe Pwes te sals staat +hs i sogmies ble eanshinheneal, and Lagat elotias of thase prespuss Cigar lb wore them Sd oS te Ais pense wrk | ; Aes coses 2 , having an of QRial b+ of the inmetes , approved Cos reliQieus meals, noenethe less depois ead these thmoates of their . religous varalks aha did not yet have @ Religious Drer. Qarvd) even vasa There , LDAS” no requloatesy TERME a thot thee relcgiaus meal 7 : sual protestion of dhe laws | VL8 late ol LK er a0 prison eyohR cank dis criminates oacinst inmates sn he Religions Meat ABhesnste diet Cohese owimeansali by Was Ung nWenGhris Sean) by aver — sme He ZV w oy Anmote” Kitchen them beb Boesh eamben loupe to Gimetes ; -a a on the regular Prrson Ate % Is Wr iaw vieloddton of the i5t Awendment ‘s vtawt be petition yYre CSovern. ment Ler & ve dress ot Breevanses “ when tos other prvsone sta lt eaaoks eetbealivate d Against Pre Mmate dhase prisenLiled av ievances lead t Vie aferesaia y Wis arm na tery cask bo =—y reasst ed aut of there and heir weboltoW ey Ccensisting ok ontroe venitye ~ ups ) eansea Hee Mmate bs wor ema ly loe eemoaed Brom his Ts uh wa vieladien of Lhe 157 Amendment ‘s pig ht te Sthe Bree exercise” of relation wher a prisons batt cha Lan \ des pits a mandottery state regulation te wrerviess bea re Yoana, presumptvreusly 4 precipitous \y remeves an inmate Brow’ his rata tous aver based on =x okt vorivteaps Phot an Wheres vcseuld howe easily cerssenied be be anteur ; Yo ute Re ou. chop loin Vd aS deliberately indifRerent | ts the (nmotkk's cig its Coeatatery ~~ Wur bs he Lak ot an sa toe ye adictal gsucce Res their bias 4 is a\lLeuabl=, Under AK US. Seehsn RSES(Q—), Per ow magistrate gastge and x Mistmet jasye te he erssnalh btased agonst ‘prssner \iGants and ts Pre ceed cothh Shetr Secheon (443 lawSucts on re basis of the prissner -3 Weyer haw rng nreoVing Semin? On Lhe matter of whether or net a Mages trebe \os e and w~ distigh Sosd-ye cans pire AS rehest oO mesvbori= SAS MrAction Le AS warltty the ats trict AKAAS and then q duck ly cenderad Qes\queent te eles art Vle case An eaees — reir lasusyer BS pranai | aver Cannan Senge in ra wb le shvs ASVTRSVsmnanth of ot the Sireumsrential evidence ° | “4