Christopher Alexander Reilly v. United States
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Whether the district court and court of appeals should have granted a certificate of appealability
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 5 WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS SHOULD HAVE GRANTED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, TO ALLOW DEFENDANT REILLY TO APPEAL THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF HIS RIGHT TO AN EVIDENTAIRY HEARING ON ONE OF HIS 28 U.S.C. § 2255 CLAIMS (INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR LATE FILING OF A MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE). II. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS SHOULD HAVE GRANTED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, ALLOWING DEFENDANT REILLY TO APPEAL THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF HIS OTHER 18 U.S.C. § 2255 CLAIM (INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL AND FAILURE TO EXPLAIN HIS APPELLATE RIGHTS TO HIM). i