No. 21-8257
Edwin Oland Andrus v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights covid-19 covid-19-restrictions due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion procedural-due-process section-2255 statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the Court omit exculpatory facts to deny a citizen his one year guaranteed by 28 U.S.C. §2255(f£)(1) when the government by locking down the defendant into their cell for COVID-19 and denying access to any form of law library caused their delay bringing into effect the (f)(2) of the statute?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION TO THE COURT Can the Court omit exculpatory facts to deny a citizen his one year guaranteed by 28 U.S.C. §2255(f£)(1) when the government by locking down the defendant into their cell for COVID-19 and denying access to any form of law library caused their delay bringing into effect the (f)(2) of the statute ?
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Edwin Oland Andrus
Edwin Oland Andrus — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent