No. 21-8258

Luke D. Patterson v. R. M. Wolfe, Warden

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arbitration civil-rights contract due-process jurisdiction retroactivity
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the recent precedents affecting arbitration clauses should be applied retroactively

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | oe /) Whethee A he locont/ peor ent hofectoves atclrctonsth , CAS shactcl . 2) Whothee Mas Dstet Couels Asia! ate! As Aposole eed pentbeas tl ELCoe.

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2022-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 28, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Luke D. Patterson
Luke D. Patterson — Petitioner
Luke D. Patterson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent