Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this court issue a writ of mandamus ordering the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to issue a writ of mandamus
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ON August 24 2021) Submission . of # / Wotlice of Filing’ of Federa|. Tort Clatms Act CFTcA) Complaint Sor even fo Disteied Judse Thomas W Theash In. "0003, The “Public Remack: Dubge Thomas W Thrash Tr. declines ps allow fhe Comyplatat Fo be Filed aF ay clu | Case, “Two of the Eleventh Crcutty Tadges, previously Rejecting a motion for retonstderation on: Thie very CFICA) lal, , | Should Fhis Court iS54e & wyptt of Mandamus Ordering He United States Court of Aypeals for the Eleventh Cireutt Jo $ssue 4 weit of Mandaynas, where Phere are no eXAtegordinagy » Checums fan ces Worrantin Witholdine The “os
2022-11-07
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-10-19
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-05
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-08-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-23
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2022)