No. 21-8261

Elgin Z. Haynie v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2022-06-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal conviction due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se-representation sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state court of appeals violates due process when a defendant is denied the right to appeal their conviction and effective assistance of counsel due to faulty sentencing instructions and pro se representation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; Question One: Whether a state court of appeals violates due process when, as a matter of right, a Defendant is denied the right to appeal his/her conviction, and effective assistance of counsel, as a result ' of the trial court’s faulty sentencing instruction, and the Defendant’s own faulty pro se representation. .

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2022)

Attorneys

Elgin Z. Haynie
Elgin Haynie — Petitioner
Elgin Haynie — Petitioner