No. 21-8263
John Matthias Watson, III v. Nevada
IFP
Tags: capital-murder criminal-procedure defendant-autonomy mccoy-precedent mccoy-v-louisana right-to-autonomy sixth-amendment trial-counsel unauthorized-concession
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it a concession of guilt by trial counsel which violated Mr. Watson's longstanding right to autonomy and the Sixth Amendment holding of McCoy v. Louisana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED CAPITAL CASE L Is it a concession of guilt by trial counsel which violated Mr. Watson’s longstanding right to autonomy and the Sixth Amendment holding of McCoy v. Louisana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018) when without authorization, during the guilt phase of a capital murder trial, counsel presented no defense to a charge of second-degree murder, and instead expressed an opinion that Watson was guilty of that offense. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-02
Reply of petitioner John Matthias Watson, III filed.
2022-07-27
Brief of respondent Nevada in opposition filed.
2022-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2022)
2022-04-25
Application (21A637) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 10, 2022.
2022-04-18
Application (21A637) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 11, 2022 to July 10, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
John Matthias Watson, III
Jamie J. Resch — Resch Law, PLLC, Petitioner
Jamie J. Resch — Resch Law, PLLC, Petitioner
The State of Nevada