No. 21-8277
Matthew Michael Cimino v. United States
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors? i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2022)
Attorneys
Matthew Cimino
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent