Did the Court of Appeals violate Petitioner's rights when it relied on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine as authority and affirmed dismissal his Complaints for Declaratory Relief, Injunctive Relief, and Specific Performance under a contract purchased in 2020 by ruling that these causes of action, requests for relief, and new defendants were previously litigated in state court in 2013 (a factual and legal impossibility) as there is no state court litigation or judgment on any of the causes of action, requests for relief, or defendants raised in District Court violating this Court's ruling in Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459 (2006)?

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Court of Appeals violate Petitioner's rights when it relied on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine as authority and affirmed dismissal his Complaints for Declaratory Relief, Injunctive Relief, and Specific Performance under a contract purchased in 2020 by ruling that these causes of action, requests for relief, and new defendants were previously litigated in state court in 2013 (a factual and legal impossibility) as there is no state court litigation or judgment on any of the causes of action, requests for relief, or defendants raised in District Court violating this Court's ruling in Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459 (2006)? i