No. 21-8284
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence due-process forensic-report habeas-corpus judicial-review mandamus obstruction-of-justice writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court should issue the writ of mandamus to mandate the lower court's review of a forensic report surrounding petitioner's substantiated actual innocence claims, where the lower court obstructed justice by prohibiting its review of that report violating petitioner's due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR THE COURT I. WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD ISSUE THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO MANDATE THE LOWER COURT'S REVIEW OF A FORENSIC REPORT SURROUNDING PETITIONER'S SUBSTANTIATED ACTUAL INNOCENCE CLAIMS, WHERE THE LOWER COURT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE BY PROHIBITING ITS REVIEW OF THAT REPORT VIOLATING PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-23
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2022)
Attorneys
Matthew Lee Staszak
Matthew Lee Staszak — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent