No. 21-8287

Michael D. Phillips v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2022-06-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: burglary civil-rights criminal-intent criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-sufficiency jury-instructions prosecutorial-burden reasonable-doubt sentencing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the prosecutor ever prove all prongs and elements for being a felon in possession?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : : QuestioHs) Dresenfed / Did the roSecutor ever prove all prongS Gnd €lemenfy iod beng lace Loon! a seesora i ohn bt A 9 OQ. Did de roseee for ever prove Phd Phe ollged ber glary : es shalt! Gnel wo Phood Consent pr, ha duce as Jo S. $007" 3, Wes the Grea Kind ever Proven ays Sock an en try and braking . Const, tafe borg larg ? 4, Loe A, Crime of berg Sterol as (twas hofchine at nigh? 5. Did the Lourd e/r in OP schba ly G conpeinty hecning as iS in 3,210 wyhie th se Frchn J Showed ‘orood of pent Mocs Gred hen insds bk ? bDac ds Phe hk of a Compe ney feng ah relying on 4 coll yeord cn 1} le } he AArcln Ve hi honer te a voed Lien of Joely Man } ond senfrte® Es JP porrSabfe » Sen bole a 4iisf bine hen homitde abolesen J} . Yo a ne hue/ Whe Senbenee® GIs the ges! o 4 rchb bbs len met by a It te o t py.son wenf Serroercled by Crp rele? 4, DL S Phu Ga AM renee hehseen rq Jewvenile 7, od ol. conf Cnt ach / 7 ? JO.Was Mb evir Proven thet fle pebhither Kd or fa berhrof Js KU Hevieling ? at, fda ehoholz bevioye om |shA br adult Copsanphen eee, Wf : be. Sate iS GQ SFere. LE Covet ehlf age. wold he Dod tof [§? Das the ttl Court ol-Anse atforne od Feel? 4, noid obreching we shah menfe don phe pasecutr ca were of As Geh ethan, Vhooghfe, cad Secale Roky lacking Hovrncl. fon as fo rh AHS Cand réssan$ 2, che hpen Ay bon Ah Ahetor I pe kif eri ? IB Was Friel cov pro See fer § Vecbrind oboe t ich Crt alkegohoss " Covlarrmpy crete Lrimefease ahs f habhes pews cble e Miles fral court obdyse Coonte/ ohh: tnt i'n allotipa Ph Artirclont to Gpen Pea whin Pina tee -h Ardent mee ds Oricherit A, a note wih h felon od tnien'h tie ? L965 G optn pire ora NO pie a part pe hehe Eh ge 7 b.54 dhe dehoden V2kL ome Les hever fdovn Conpehaf a3 fe ‘G Ae bien afta Compe hat eceing ase Vege le Sf fPGttood fs Je ReneS tuconpetn ‘a -hed Vink fe Wt Idole} Yh, ; , Arend a t ight I. Sle On elligahtn od. Court Crrov an the Achel/¢ of Hk Suck chy poblathenra fp rale 3.d)d wes pach on the AA, do VL dow S PA roten Should he heve vecared hhsilf tow ti poo tae tb Pohudice ? WS. Dow Ape Lh Ad rot Criohng 4 6 Hoel nde Ayer hu P SAT Ae Detorenf r320s Obly 4 monly pest Ais 946 Bethe soc [db he shit guel4 dor a Vrhvdekzed She i | . | rey

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2022)

Attorneys

Michael D. Phillips
Michael D. Phillips — Petitioner
Michael D. Phillips — Petitioner