No. 21-8288
William Jack Parkerson v. Oregon
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: accomplice-instructions court-of-appeals due-process federal-standard harmless-error oregon-court-of-appeals trial-evidence trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the oregon court of appeals apply the correct federal harmless error standard violating Due Process, when viewing the evidence at trial when it determined that the failure to give accomplice instructions was harmless error?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Question #1 Did the oregon court of appeals apply the correct federal harmless error standard violating Due Process, when viewing the evidence at trial when it determined that the failure to give accomplice instructions was harmless error? 2
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-15
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2022-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2022)
Attorneys
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent