Is applying state law Anti-Slapp procedure in Federal Court consistent with Shady Grove?

question presented is: 1. Is applying state law Anti-Slapp procedure in : Federal Court consistent with this Court’s decision in Shady Grove? In particular, —.. a. Do Anti-Slapp law procedures Directly Conflict with Federal Rules 8, 12, and 56; the Necessary and Proper Clause; and ; Federal law? ; b. Is the Ninth Circuit’s “Side By Side” Approach impracticable, Rendering Shady Grove as well as Rules 8, 12, and 56 Easily-Evaded Formalites c. Does the Ninth Circuit Approach Conflict With Other Circuits That Have Uniformly Followed the Shady Grove Rule, rejecting state procedures ? , 2. Should this. Court wait ten more years to ensure Circuit compliance with Shady Grove? LIST OF ALL PROCEEDINGS U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Walker v. Intelli-heart Services, Inc. et. al Case Nos. 20-15688, . 20-16341, final judgments entered Sept 23, 2021 US. District Court for Nevada Walker v. Intelli-heart_ Services, Inc. et. al., Case No. 3:18-cv-00132, final judgment entered Mar. 4, 2020