Whether the Second Circuit Court had jurisdiction to hear the case: appeal or writ of mandamus

No question identified. : THE UNITED STATES SENATE, DENYING PETITIONER THE RIGHT TO TESTIFY OPPOSING THE NOMINATION OF JUDGE GARLAND, (3) QUESTION OF PROPER JURISDICTION BEFORE THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT FOR RELIEF (4)UNSEALING THE FBI’S INVESTIGATIVE REPORT IN THE TOTALITY OF ALL ISSUES INCLUDING ALLEGED MASSIVE COPYRIGHT THIEF AND INFRINGEMENT WITH..OVER 107 OR MORE JUDGES ASSOCIATED IN THE REPORT, AND 75 OR MORE FILMS ALLEGEDLY DISCUSSED IN THE FBI'S REPORT BASED ON PETITIONER’S copyrights. David Louis Whitehead 1906 Scott St. Bossier, Louisiana 71 Cell No. 318-820-5029 Email: 2 QUESTIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW e Whether the Second Circuit Court had jurisdiction to hear the case: appeal or writ of mandamus. e Whether the Second Circuit Court erred in denying to convert petitioner’s appeal to request for Writ ; of Mandamus giving the court jurisdiction. e Whether District Court Judge should recuse himself due to his association with Harvard University and petitioner’s injunctive relief motion to enjoin Judge Merrick Garland as Attorney General of the United States, due to his association with Harvard University Board of Overseers involving fraud on the court in petitioner’s related case and cases. e Whether Judge Merrick Garland should be enjoined to become Attorney General due to fraud on the court involving petitioner related cases associated with Harvard University(serving in this role as Attorney General) pending this high court’s judicial review. e Whether the US Senate Judiciary Committee improperly denied petitioner due process of law refusing to allow him to testify opposing Judge . Merritt Garland’s nomination as Attorney General of the United States during the Senate Confirmation Hearings, in relations to the fraud on the court associated with Harvard University as President of 3 Harvard’s Board of Overseers with defendant's witnesses and former employees, and others. e Whether the circuit court should have unseal the federal investigation (FBI) in part to determine what copyrights were stolen if any, and Judge Merritt Garland and others role in the cases. ~@ Whether there is an appearance of conflict of interest relating to the District Court judge presiding on the case. An appearance is actually a conflict of interest requiring recusal. ‘ | 4 Parties . Petitioner is David Louis Whitehead. Respondents are Travelers Insurance Company and Gabrielle Bailey. 5 Tables of Content Questions PLESOM CC Pages 3 & 4.