Whether conduct that is consistent with either lawful or unlawful behavior, and in which law-abiding members of the general public routinely engage, can establish reasonable suspicion justifying a Terry stop merely because it occurs in a high-crime area

QUESTION PRESENTED In Terry v. Ohio, this Court held that officers may, consistent with the Fourth Amendment, briefly detain a person based on reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity. 392 U.S. 1, 30 (1968). This Court subsequently clarified in Illinois v. Wardlow that a suspect’s mere presence in a high-crime area, without more, is an insufficient basis for reasonable suspicion. 528 U.S. 119, 124 (2000). The question presented is: Whether conduct that is consistent with either lawful or unlawful behavior, and in which law-abiding members of the general public routinely engage, can establish reasonable suspicion justifying a Terry stop merely because it occurs in a high-crime area. (D