No. 21-844
Jim Carmack v. Mark Janny, et al.
Tags: civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech housing-services parole parole-conditions religious-freedom state-action state-actor summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the employee of a private, religious nonprofit may be held liable, as a state actor, for making pro bono housing and social services at the nonprofit's facility contingent on participation in religious programming
Question Presented (from Petition)
question presented is: Whether the employee of a private, religious nonprofit may be held liable, as a state actor, for making pro bono housing and social services at the nonprofit’s facility contingent on participation in religious programming.
Docket Entries
2022-01-26
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2022-01-05
Joint stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.
2021-12-09
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Jim Carmack
2021-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 7, 2022.
2021-12-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2022 to February 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 6, 2022)
2021-10-25
Application (21A107) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until December 4, 2021.
2021-10-21
Application (21A107) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 4, 2021 to January 3, 2022, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Jim Carmack
John J. Bursch — Alliance Defending Freedom, Petitioner
John J. Bursch — Alliance Defending Freedom, Petitioner
Mark Janny
Charles Bruce Wayne — DLA Piper LLP (US), Respondent
Charles Bruce Wayne — DLA Piper LLP (US), Respondent