No. 21-85

Neil G. Leeds v. Hanmi Bank

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-07-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: access-to-justice civil-procedure civil-rights court-reporter due-process in-forma-pauperis pro-se standing unruh-act
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court including the appeal court should have followed The California Supreme Court Ruling under Jameson v. Desta to provide a free court reporter for a pro se In forma pauperis litigant

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The American Dream. Where a young citizen beat the odds of adversity and extreme poverty with only a ninth grade education to build one of the most recognized brand of mattress stores in Los Angeles using his first and last name in likeness to his corporation. Only to have his bank leave him bankrupt and homeless after an entire life of work, which would leave him no access to justice to defend himself in court. (1) Whether the lower court including the appeal court should have followed The California Supreme Court Ruling under Jameson v. Desta to provide a free court reporter for a pro se In forma pauperis litigant. (2) Whether the appeal court can dismiss the pro se litigants corporation which is also his personal name on appeal after all fees were paid and was timely rendering his ability to challenge his original case filed impossible under the theory of law raised by opposing counsel. (3) Whether a small business corporation. With that being the President Ceo as the only owner shareholder the ability to have standing to litigate under the Unruh Civil Rights Act. 7 y

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-29
2021-10-29
Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent Hanmi Bank to respond filed.
2021-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Hanmi Bank
Mark T. HansenLim Nexus, LLP, Respondent
Neil G. Leeds
Neil G. Leeds — Petitioner